<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>Z94 - The Rock Station &#187; state laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://z94.com/tags/state-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://z94.com</link>
	<description>Lawton/Fort Sill&#039;s Rock Station</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:33:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chicago Considers &#039;Violence Tax&#039; on Guns and Ammo</title>
		<link>http://z94.com/chicago-considers-violence-tax-on-guns-and-ammo/</link>
		<comments>http://z94.com/chicago-considers-violence-tax-on-guns-and-ammo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Adams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsminteractive.com/?p=145487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[City officials in Chicago are considering a proposed “violence tax” on guns and ammunition in hopes that it will help shade in the gray areas of a $115 million black hole in the city’s budget and police the number of guns in circulation on the streets. This has Second Amendment supporters ticked off because sources say the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>City officials in Chicago are considering a proposed “violence tax” on guns and ammunition in hopes that it will help shade in the gray areas of a $115 million black hole in the city’s budget and police the number of guns in circulation on the streets. This has Second Amendment supporters ticked off because sources say the proposed tax will increase the prices of these items exponentially, even though no one yet knows what the tax would be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://z94.com/chicago-considers-violence-tax-on-guns-and-ammo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://tsminteractive.com/files/2012/10/Quinn-Rooney-Getty-Images.jpg" height="2764" width="4145" /><media:description xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">Quinn Rooney, Getty Images</media:description>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should There Be a Law Against Using a Phone While Driving? &#8212; Survey of the Day</title>
		<link>http://z94.com/should-there-be-a-law-against-using-a-phone-while-driving-survey-of-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://z94.com/should-there-be-a-law-against-using-a-phone-while-driving-survey-of-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Taylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsminteractive.com/?p=142945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Currently, 10 states and the District of Columbia ban any cell phone use while operating a motor vehicle. According to a new survey from AutoTrader.com, though, most people would be okay if this restriction spread to the rest of the country. Fifty-seven percent support a legislative ban on talking on a mobile device while driving. Opinion is close [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently, <a href="http://www.ghsa.org/html/stateinfo/laws/cellphone_laws.html" target="_blank">10 states and the District of Columbia</a> ban any cell phone use while operating a motor vehicle. According to a <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/survey-from-autotradercom-shows-major-inconsistency-between-distracted-driving-attitudes-and-behaviors-170362236.html" target="_blank">new survey from AutoTrader.com</a>, though, most people would be okay if this restriction spread to the rest of the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://z94.com/should-there-be-a-law-against-using-a-phone-while-driving-survey-of-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://tsminteractive.com/files/2012/09/Driving-cell-phone.jpg" height="787" width="1218" /><media:description xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"> Jeff J Mitchell, Getty Images</media:description>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Jersey Motorists Banned from Smiling in Driver&#039;s License Photos</title>
		<link>http://z94.com/new-jersey-motorists-banned-from-smiling-in-drivers-license-photos/</link>
		<comments>http://z94.com/new-jersey-motorists-banned-from-smiling-in-drivers-license-photos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Adams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weird News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Driver's License]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsminteractive.com/?p=142771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Jersey is forcing residents who operate motor vehicles to wipe those big, silly smiles off of their faces – when they get their drivers license photo taken, that is. The state has instituted the smiling ban because says its facial recognition software does not comprehend all those happy-go-lucky, ear-to-ear smiles that some motorists are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Jersey is forcing residents who operate motor vehicles to wipe those big, silly smiles off of their faces – when they get their <a class="vt-p" href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/09/nj_bans_big_smiles_from_driver.html#incart_river_default" target="_blank">drivers license photo</a> taken, that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://z94.com/new-jersey-motorists-banned-from-smiling-in-drivers-license-photos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://tsminteractive.com/files/2012/09/Han-S-Flickr.jpg" height="566" width="850" /><media:description xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">Han S, Flickr</media:description>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 888/963 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via wac.450F.edgecastcdn.net/80450F/z94.com

Served from: z94.com @ 2013-06-20 01:53:18 -->